Question: 1 / 50

What does the Rule of Three say about comparables when preparing a CMA?

At least three comparables should be used.

The Rule of Three emphasizes the importance of utilizing at least three comparables when preparing a Comparative Market Analysis (CMA). By selecting a minimum of three comparables, an appraiser or real estate professional can ensure that the analysis reflects a more balanced and accurate assessment of the property's value. This approach helps mitigate the risk of relying too heavily on a single data point, which could be an outlier or an atypical property. Using three comparables also allows for a broader perspective on market trends and behaviors, offering insights into how similar properties have performed in the market. This practice helps establish a reliable range of values, fostering confidence in the final valuation. While more comparables can enhance the analysis, the Rule of Three serves as a foundational guideline to ensure that a valuation is grounded in relevant market data without becoming overwhelming or convoluted.

Five comparables are required for accuracy.

Only one comparable is needed for valuation.

Comparables must be from the same neighborhood.

Next

Report this question